Volume 01, Issue 03

Research Article

Credit Mobility and Pedagogical Barriers of Engineering Institutions in NEP 2020 Implementation

Katta Jan Reddy

Assistant Professor , Department of English, Stanley College of Engineering and Technology for Women, Hyderabad, India

Co-Author(s):

Dr. Krishna Chaitanya Edunuru

Associate Professor, Department of English
Institute: Central University of Kashmir, Tulmulla, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India

Dr. Haribhau R. Bhapkar

Associate Professor and Head Department of Mathematics
Institute: Central University of Kashmir, Tulmulla

Submitted: 15-09-2025

Accepted: 20-10-2025

Published: 31-12-2025

Pages: 287-293

NEP 2020 Engineering Education Credit Mobility Faculty Resistance Industry–Academic Linkages
Download PDF
Abstract:

Though there are certain barriers like effective framework for the effective implementation of National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 in engineering education, NEP envisions a model shift in Indian higher education which promotes flexibility, interdisciplinary, and student-centric approaches. This research article explores critically the systematic pedagogical challenges hindering the realization of NEP 2020 within technical institutions. Taking these issues-rigidity in course delivery and semester based time constraints which actually delays innovation and control opportunities for holistic learning, credit mobility remains controlled by incompatible frameworks in all engineering institutions. In addition, to operate the academic credit Bank there are certain practical challenges which includes misalignment in evaluation standards and lack of institutional preparedness. The other complications and resistance from faculty, pedagogical practices and apprehension towards the change of reforms in engineering institutions are present. The demand for a pedagogical change toward outcome based and technology enabled method of imparting the knowledge underscores the urgency of sustained faculty development initiatives. It is clear that without sufficient training and support practices, educators remain not equipped to align with the vision of NEP 2020. The present paper makes the argument that addressing these kind of barriers badly requires a systematic reforms, enhancement of potentiality and improvement of robust frameworks for credit mobility and interdiscilenarity, besides faculty efficacy and methodological innovations critical to ensure the transformative potential of NEP 2020 in engineering education.